Reviews in the Flat Earth theme (Part I)

Flat Earth

My topic today focuses on the inner house and deals with common mistakes we are the supporters of the Flat Earth, because of its length divided by two sections, I know that the subject in its sections may cause noise and fuss some of you will not accept it and will attack me severely and others will claim that my account is hacked and others will say I spherical infiltrator! But that's not going to tell me what I think is right. The truth remains above all, I hope that I am listening. It is time to stop quoting false evidence against Football .!

A large number of the two flats indicate one of the big watch marks, the sunrise of the sun from its Morocco as evidence of the flatness and persistence and the rotation of the sun around them say if it is spherical and revolve around itself and will stop and then reverse its rotation (for reversal of the direction of the sun rotation) will occur disasters on the Earth surface That's the spin, but I see the measurement is inaccurate. These are the marks of the hour and differ from our usual life, theoretically no problem with this particular recital and I do not see evidence against the rotary spherical because the reflection of the rotation of the Earth (exceptional and extraordinary) will be accompanied by (exceptional and extraordinary) compatibility with the characteristics of the air and water and everything on the surface of their globe, I hope that everyone understands that the big hour markers are not only in themselves but also around the usual laws, for example: The Antichrist is a sign of the great hour, not only this, but also the extraordinary, which will be followed by water, food and all livelihoods except Two blood! Moreover, that mark will be accompanied by a radical change of human nature. Every Muslim who attends that event will have a different human nature, at a time when there is no food or drink, the praise of the Muslim, his Taber and his mention of God will enrich him for food and drink! Is this understandable and logical with the ordinary Sunnis of the universe until we measure it with exceptional Sunnis? In the time of the Antichrist the Muslim will not be able to eat and drink because there is nothing but the male God will sing about it and will give him the necessary nutrients for his body and the amount of water needed to drink daily to maintain the vital functions of blood especially and for the whole body in general so his body stays stable and works normally as he Yak To drink with his normal day! I hope my idea has arrived clearly.

A thorny and big issue that provoked a big mistake and is the subject of the Sea of heaven, I see most of the evidence leads to lack of it and most of the evidence of his supporters is not accurate, yet did not push me to deny it altogether and insisted on extreme caution, and I demand the commitment of the proper scientific approach if one wants to support the Sea of Heaven He tries to get close to the right, as the proponents of the word "swim" infer that there is a sea in the lower sky where criminality is done, but metaphorical, not literal, you will say, "What is it?" I reply with two manuals that I built my opinion on: 1-When we follow the words of the interpreters, the followers and the former scientists we will find them or (most of them at least) explain the swim in flux and circulation and not a real swim in water, I was and still conservative on the methodology I support the reflection and the reflection of the Curran as God has done It means to issue a definitive sentenced to our reflections, but to return to the companions and those who are coming to their hands, to see their words and take them into account, so that we will be able to behave in the Curran by managing the first two and their jurisprudence that they are the closest to them, that is to say, we cannot overemphasize and interrupt their health.

2. The other evidence is from the verse itself, the word "swims" includes everything mentioned in the verse, namely the Sun, the Moon, the night and the day, you said that the word "swim" means that the sun and the moon swim with a real sea in the lower sky, does this also apply to the night and the day and swim in a real sea The term swimming is all inclusive but we know (for sure) that the day is a small layer close to the Earth, but all of us now on the surface of the earth directly and that layer disappear with all the experiments of amateur balloons at the height of tens of kilometers only, where is the sea where the day swims and are we now soaked in water? Again, this confirms the mistake of literally taking the word as our brothers guided us and all of them.

Perhaps we can be acquainted with the cracks of the sky on the day of Resurrection and the fall of what is in it (celestial bodies) may indicate that there is no water in it if found to fall as criminality fell (I stress that this is only for trust and not strong evidence)

Which denies the existence of a sea where criminality is a reality, if it finds water, it will have a great effect on the light and we will not see what we see daily from the sun and stars in this body, look for example of the seas how far can light penetrate? At a depth of 85 meters, only 1% of the light remains, even if the sun is perpendicular and almost completely dark at a depth of 200 meters, although some specialists remember the deepest dimensions of the light disappearing in the sea, but what concerns us here is the idea, if that sea is really found and the bodies of the sky swim in it how do we reach the rays and all The spectra of light are so united? Except for the light of the furthest and weaker stars of the sun.

Note: It will not work here argument that the sea is sweet and not salty and devoid of any impurities it will only reduce the effect of refraction and dispersion and will not cancel it so the water remains water

It is more surprising to acknowledge the effect of the atmosphere or (airspace in a more precise and correct way) than it is strange to recognize its effect on the beams of light coming from the sun and cause the light to break down and the appearance of its spectra especially when the sun is away while assuming that the sea of the lower sky has no effect on light despite our knowledge (empirically To be sure, the effect of water on the light is much greater than the impact of air and gases!!!

Watch the video first, and then you should be several notes:

The presence of the apogee and the rock does not support the presence of a sea that swims in the crime, resulting in the swimming and approaching (perigee) and the rise and departure (apogee) as one swims in the sea, since we even walk and run we succumb to this law and the issue just need some meditation, watch the horizontal level of a person's head during a walk, Slash and rise and will not remain on one level parallel to the Milan road level and it becomes clearer by its intensity and flow.

The Brothers show videos showing ripples of the stars, but this is due to the weakness of the zoom compared to the Orb, the stars are beyond the Sun and the planets (it is true that all criminality is close to achieving the perspective on the flat Earth, but in any case the stars remain beyond the sun and planets) should be used A star telescope no cameras, no matter how powerful. The telescope is the most accurate and efficient by treating the next light, and the ripples on the moon when it is enlarged are due to atmospheric air and the water vapor, dust and plankton... Etc

1-searchlights are very close (sure)

2-The camera zoom is very high and depicts the features of the sun in the same way but does not specify the features of the headlamp for its weakness. (This has been applied to the moon carefully.)

3-searchlights do not swim in water (sure)

4-searchlights are not reflected across hail from a much farther place (sure)

5-searchlights have identical frequencies and reflections without a dome (sure)

Should some know the characteristics of light?

Anyone who invokes these points around the dome or the reflection of light through a hail in relation to the source of the light of criminality, or who speaks about the weakness of the moonlight or after extreme criminality or swimming crime in water may seek other arguments because the interpretation of a metaphysical order is not taken without scrutiny.

Because all these arguments match the flashlights without a dome and without water and without a hail and without another source of light and without a huge dimension, here is a simple experience worthy of meditation.

Do not deny any opinion, only what you see in some videos about these things is not proof and it has nothing to do with evidence

All over

Always beware o brothers from videos spread on YouTube and it is full of fallacies and misfortune it has a great popularity between the two flats! Is this evidence of a lack of rational thinking and distance from the scientific approach? Yes, it is, too. With the previous remarks a good example, it is sad that we have to focus a lot of our time and discussions for the masses and not for the people! Brothers you have to be careful then beware of YouTube videos they are stuffed with fallacies, some of those channels and videos inadvertently carry false and others deliberately and in advance planning and aim to make the flat ground in the minds of people and show the two flats with the appearance of ignorant, distant from the flag, and have another goal as The conviction of some of the two flats and the argument of their arguments makes it easier for the football players to break that evidence, and it appears to those who are wrong, the flat to keep them from the truth.

The sun:

Most brothers observe the rules of the triangle as a basis for measuring the height of the sun from the Flat Earth, unfortunately this is totally wrong in my opinion as the characteristics of the light include refraction and curvature, how will we know what is going on in the upper airspace layers or in the lower sky before exiting and entering the air zone? We do not know what is the minimum sky, and therefore we do not understand the light. The rise of the sun is metaphysical in my opinion, and by the way, I would like to focus here on the famous images that the brothers see near the sun from the ground as the evidence of the separation of rays between the clouds if we take this inference, the sun will be above The clouds are direct, they almost stick to them! In fact, all of these rays descend parallel to the water surface shown in the image! How much space is this water hole? One kilometre or five or more, are we now on land just as much as that little marine space? Do we see a change in the same sunlight as the sun? This area is worth nothing compared to the surface area of the Earth or the height of the sun above the earth, no matter how high it is, we will hardly find a difference in the brightness of the sun on that small patch if you measure it from any location on this water hole, remember the impact of the perspective and the characteristics of light on what we see, in the picture The other is the sun standing behind the trunk of the tree as it seems to us or is it illusion and unreal illusion?

And something close, which is the reflection of sunlight from the waves of the sea, it is assumed that if the earth is spherical, the beam will not reach straight! (see the picture) No brothers anyway we will see the same view along the sea horizon until the sun disappears, in both cases the Rays reach the bottom of the wave only a little and the lower the sun, the smell will be concentrated on the tops of the waves only and the sun rays reflected to our eyes a straight line of the An acre Q.

Flat Earth

I never meant to detract from anyone, and I should not. If I detracted from my brothers I detracted from myself but I mean advice I couldn't and apologize for any inappropriate phrases that came out of me unintentionally .